The difference between Machiovelli and Lao tzu was that Machiovelli was more for philosophy and science and that’s how he ran his nation. He made a book “The Art of War” and it was all the science on military. To keep all control he was very dishonest. I disagree with this type of leadership. I feel like you need to be nice and not decieving to your people. Lao Tzu may not have actually been real and that is something cool I learned from my research. He came up with Chinese Taoism meaning that he believed in the simple way of living. He knew the difference between good and evil. If I had to choose one of them to be my leader I would have to pick Lao Tzu. He is all about nature and Machievilli is about doing evil to get what he wants.
No comments:
Post a Comment